The claimant
obtained a license to produce and sell certain products based on the
respondent’s technology. The respondent had an obligation to deliver technical
documentation to the claimant within a specified period, but the claimant
alleged the documentation was insufficient, impacting their production and
leading to a claim for termination with compensation. The respondent contended
that the claimant had not engaged in required pre-arbitral negotiations, thus
challenging the tribunal’s jurisdiction. The tribunal upheld the claimant’s
request for arbitration, determining that the claimant had made sufficient
efforts to negotiate, satisfying the pre-arbitration requirement. The tribunal
awarded the claimant compensation due to the respondent’s inadequate documentation
provision.
M. D
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu